The role of transnational online arbitration in regulating cross-border e-business

Online dispute resolution

The role of transnational online arbitration in regulating cross-border e-business – Part Istar, open

Antonis Patrikiosa
aTechnology Law Group, Field Fisher Waterhouse LLP, London Office

Available online 12 November 2007.

Abstract

Part I

1. Introduction – 2. Since we have a hammer, the problem had better be a nail – 3. The problem is not a nail: 3.1. Unaddressed challenges, 3.1.1. Technological solutions, 3.1.2. International initiatives towards modernisation of private international law, 3.1.3. Convergence or harmonisation of national e-business laws, 3.1.4. OADR and online arbitration – 4. The hammer is not the only tool: 4.1. ADR and arbitration, 4.2. ODR, 4.3. Supportive and supervisory function of the courts.

This article suggests that traditional legal solutions based on localisation and territoriality are inappropriate for cross-border e-business transactions. The instantaneous, ubiquitous and truly international internet necessitates solutions with similar qualities. The elements of a plausible solution can be found in three relatively recent developments: the Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) movement; the emerging principles of internet governance; and the concept of co-regulation. The catalyst, however, is a concept rooted in the theory and practice of international commercial arbitration. This article argues that the optimum solution is a truly international, decentralised, multi-stakeholder, multi-level and multi-instrument co-regulatory system based on ODR and centred on transnational online arbitration with the role of the courts limited to the guardianship of public policy.

CLICK HERE for full article

Computer Law & Security Report
Volume 24, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 66-76

more...


COMMENTS

I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it. by online casino games


Posted by: casino online on Dec 11, 04 | 4:32 am

In the information age, you don't teach philosophy as they did after feudalism. You perform it. If Aristotle were alive today he'd have a talk show. by poker online


Posted by: online poker on Dec 11, 04 | 8:12 pm

We are shut out of all power and authority, by reason we are never employed either in civil or martial affairs, our counsels are despised, and laughed at, the best of our actions are trodden down with scorn, by the over-weening conceit, men have of themselves, and through a despisement of us. by texas hold'em poker


Posted by: texas holdem poker on Dec 12, 04 | 3:21 pm

Man is the measure of all things: of those which are, that they are; of those which are not, that they are not. by paradise poker


Posted by: paradise poker on Dec 13, 04 | 12:13 am

We have unmistakable proof that throughout all past time, there has been a ceaseless devouring of the weak by the strong. by online gambling


Posted by: online casino on Dec 13, 04 | 9:32 am

A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines. With consistency a great soul has simply nothing to do. by casino gambling


Posted by: casino games on Dec 13, 04 | 5:47 pm

Opinion is ultimately determined by the feelings, and not by the intellect. by texas hold'em


Posted by: texas hold'em on Dec 14, 04 | 1:39 am


Notify me when someone replies to this post?

 


home
  | citdr  |  odrnews  |  events  |  contact us  |  site map  |  xml


The Center for Information Technology and Dispute Resolution
Gordon Hall, UMass Amherst, MA 01002-1735