|
Recommendations to the Third
Annual UN Forum on Online Dispute Resolution
|
|
|
|
By Rapporteurs Professors Nadja Alexander and Laurence Boulle
|
|
|
|
The
Third Annual UN Forum on Online Dispute Resolution was hosted by the
International Conflict Resolution Centre (ICRC) at the University of Melbourne
in collaboration with the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for
Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP).
|
|
|
|
Recommendations
fell into six key areas:
|
|
I.
Applications of ODR,
|
|
II.
Infrastructure for ODR,
|
|
III.
Linkages in the ODR industry,
|
|
IV.
Diversity,
|
|
V.
Sustainability,
|
|
VI.
Quality
|
|
|
|
A
common theme emerging from the six key areas was the need to emphasise the human interface with technology in all ODR
developments.
|
|
|
|
The
following specific recommendations have been drawn from the presentations
of the main speakers and the contributions of other forum participants in
the plenary and small group sessions.
|
|
|
|
I. Applications of ODR
|
|
(1)
To broaden the applications
of ODR to include transactional applications e.g. to facilitate online
negotiations, conflict transformation, peace building, peace keeping and
political decision-making;
|
|
(2)
To continue the development
of ODR in ways that are intuitive, culturally sensitive, scalable and
platform-neutral;
|
|
(3)
To develop user-friendly
ODR applications
|
|
(4)
To develop ODR applications
in schools and other educational institutions in order to integrate ODR
systems into the lives of future generations.
|
|
|
|
II. Infrastructure
|
|
(5)
To explore options to
strengthen the technical infrastructure for ODR, particularly with respect
to improving access;
|
|
(6)
To develop standards for
ODR systems for ease of exchanges of cases and other data across systems
and comparability across different applications;
|
|
(7)
To work towards
invisibility of ODR in mainstream dispute resolution;
|
|
(8)
To develop common security
software;
|
|
(9)
To look to governments to
contribute to and support “heavy-life” infrastructure.
|
|
|
|
III. Linkages
|
|
(10)
To promote vertical and
horizontal linkages that will facilitate the adoption of ODR, e.g., setting
up of ODR professional organizations and reaching out to groups not
currently involved in ODR, to increase shared learning between designers;
|
|
(11)
To learn from ADR theory
and practice, highlighting the similarities between the two fields and also
how ADR changes when it goes online e.g. through the introduction of the
fourth party;
|
|
|
|
|
|
IV. Diversity
|
|
|
|
(12)
To address the need for
diversity in ODR by encouraging services to utilize multiple languages and
neutrals to be trained in cross-cultural competency;
|
|
(13)
To encourage diversity of
ODR applications (see also Applications above);
|
|
(14)
To contextualise ODR to
local cultures (glocalisation);
|
|
(15)
To encourage demographic
research to enable accurate responses to diversity needs;
|
|
(16)
To investigate the use of
anonymity in ODR to neutralise or otherwise manage prejudices;
|
|
|
|
V. Sustainability
|
|
(17)
To enhance the
sustainability of ODR by:
|
|
a. the use of appropriate
technology to make services affordable, e.g. use pre-existing technology as
a starting point where suitable
|
|
b. the solicitation of support from governments and grant agencies,
|
|
c. continued research into issues related to the sustainability of ODR;
|
|
|
|
VI. Quality
|
|
(18)
To improve quality of ODR
services by:
|
|
a. continuing professional
development of neutrals,
|
|
b. the formulation of codes of conducts, standards of practice, and
|
|
c. feedback loops;
|
|
(19)
To develop qualitative
research capacity in ODR.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|